|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
To Rank or To Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education
Simon Marginson
University of Melbourne, Australia
Marijk van der Wende
CHEPS (University of Twente) and the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Global university rankings have cemented the notion of a world university market arranged in a single "league table" for comparative purposes and have given a powerful impetus to intranational and international competitive pressures in the sector. Both the research rankings by Shanghai Jiao Tong University and the composite rankings by the Times Higher Education Supplement have been widely publicised and already appear to have generated incentives in favour of greater system stratification and the concentration of elite researchers. However, global comparisons are possible only in relation to one model of institution, that of the comprehensive research intensive university, and for the most part are tailored to science-strong and English-speaking universities. Neither the Shanghai nor the Times rankings provide guidance on the quality of teaching. It is important to secure "clean" rankings, transparent, free of self-interest, and methodologically coherent, that create incentives to broad-based improvement.
Key Words: university rankings • globalisation • competition • stratification • quality
References
- Altbach, P. (2006). The dilemmas of ranking. International Higher Education, 42, 2-3.
- Bloom, D. (2005). Raising the pressure: Globalization and the need for higher education reform. In G. Jones, P. McCarney, & M. Skolnik (Eds.), Creating knowledge: Strengthening nations: The changing role of higher education (pp. 21-41). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
- The brains business. (2005, September 8). The Economist.
- Brooks, R. (2005). Measuring university quality. Review of Higher Education, 29(1), 1-21.[CrossRef]
- Center for Higher Education Development. ( 2005). Study and research in Germany. Retrieved March 16, 2006, from http://www.daad.de/deutschland/hochschulen/hochschulranking/06543.en.htm
- Clarke, M. (2005). Quality assessment lessons from Australia and New Zealand. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 183-197.[CrossRef]
- Dill, D., & Soo, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university rankings. Higher Education, 49, 495-533.[CrossRef]
- European Commission. (2003). Communication from the commission. The role of universities in the Europe of knowledge. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
- Field, K. (2006, March 31). Another accountability idea: A new database that would customize college rankings. Chronicle of Higher Education.
- Frank, R., & Cook, P. (1995). The winner-take-all society. New York: Free Press.
- Guarino, C., Ridgeway, G., Chun, M., & Buddin, R. (2005). Latent variable analysis: A new approach to university ranking. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 147-165.[CrossRef]
- Institute for Scientific Information. (2006 ). Data on highly cited researchers. Retrieved April 10, 2006, from http://isihighlycited.com/
- Kirp, D. (2004). Shakespeare, Einstein and the bottom-line: The marketing of higher education Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Levy, D. (2002). Unanticipated development: Perspectives on private higher education's emerging roles (PROPHE Working Paper Series No. 1). Retrieved April 2, 2006, from http://www.albany.edu/dept/eaps/prophe
- Liu, N. ( 2006, February). The differentiation and classification of Chinese universities and the building of world-class universities in China. Presentation at the seminar at Leiden University. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from http://www.leidenslatest.leidenuniv.nl/content_docs/presentation_prof._liu.ppt#364,4,DreamofChineseforWCU
- Liu, N., & Cheng, Y. (2005). The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 127-136.[CrossRef]
- Liu, N., & Liu, L. (2005). University rankings in China. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 217-227.[CrossRef]
- National Science Board. (2006). Science and engineering indicators 2004. Retrieved April 9, 2006, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/
- Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2004a). Internationalization and trade in higher education: Opportunities and challenges Paris: Author.
- Rocki, M. (2005). Statistical and mathematical aspects of ranking: Lessons from Poland. Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 173-181.[CrossRef]
- Sapp, M., & McCormick, A. (2006). Revision of the Carnegie classifications. AIR Alert, 25(1). Retrieved May 14, 2007, from http://www.airweb.org/page.asp?page=637
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University Institute of Higher Education. (2005). Academic ranking of world universities. Retrieved February 1, 2006, from http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/ranking.htm
- Stiglitz, J. (1999). Knowledge as a global public good. In I. Kaul, I. Grunberg, & M. Stern (Eds.), Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st century (pp. 308-325). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Teichler, U. (2004). The changing debate on internationalization of higher education. Higher Education, 48, 5-26.[CrossRef]
- Unesco/Ihep. (2006). International partnership issues groundbreaking principles on ranking of higher education institutions. Retrieved June 3, 2006, from http://www.che.de/downloads/Berlin_Principles_IREG_534.pdf
- Usher, A., & Savino, M. (2006). A world of difference: A global survey of university league tables. Retrieved April 2, 2006, from http://www.educationalpolicy.org
- van der Wende, M.C. (2006, February). The challenges of university ranking. Presentation at the seminar at Leiden University. Retrieved May 8, 2006, from http://www.leidenslatest.leidenuniv.nl/content_docs/presentation_prof._van_der_wende.ppt
- Van Dyke, N. (2005). Twenty years of university reports cards, Higher Education in Europe, 30(2), 103-124.[CrossRef]
- van Vught, F.A., Bartelse, J., Bohmert, D., Burquel, N., Divis, J., Huisman J., et al. (2005). Institutional profiles. Towards a typology of higher education institutions in Europe. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.utwente.nl/cheps/documenten/engreport05institutionalprofiles.pdf
- Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2006). What is changing in academic research? Trends and future scenarios (Draft paper). Paris: OECD-CERI.
- World Bank. (2006). World Bank data and statistics. Retrieved April 2, 2006, from http://www.worldbank.org/data
- World University Rankings. (2005, October 28). Times Higher Education Supplement. Retrieved April 10, 2006, from www.thes.co.uk
- The world's most global universities. (2006, August 21-28). Newsweek, pp. 36-69.
- Yang, R. (2005). The Chinese professoriate in comparative perspective: Self-perceptions, academic life, gender differences and internal differentiation. In A. Welch (Ed.), The professoriate: Portrait of a profession (pp. 193-204). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Journal of Studies in International Education, Vol. 11, No. 3-4,
306-329 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1028315307303544
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
M. Ishikawa
University Rankings, Global Models, and Emerging Hegemony: Critical Analysis from Japan
Journal of Studies in International Education,
June 1, 2009;
13(2):
159 - 173.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
