Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Studies in International Education
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teichler, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Changes of ERASMUS under the Umbrella of SOCRATES

Ulrich Teichler

The largest program in Europe for the promotion of student mobility, ERASMUS, was expected to undergo major changes when it became a subprogram of SOCRATES, the umbrella program of the European Union for various educational activities inaugurated in 1995. Subsequently, though the number of mobile students supported increased, the emphasis of the programs shifted toward teaching staff exchange and curricular innovation. Moreover, the managerial thrust was substantially revised. Funds were not provided to networks of cooperating departments, but to individual institutions of higher education that were required to guarantee the quality of exchange through bilateral contracts with partner institutions and demonstrate the role their SOCRATES-supported activities should play in the context of the institutional policy through the formulation of a European policy statement. The SOCRATES 2000 Evaluation Study provides evidence that the changes during the first years of implementation were less substantial than called for. The quality of student exchange remained more or less stable in spite of substantial decline for support per student. The number of mobile teachers increased considerably, but the duration of the teaching period abroad became shorter. Moderate strengthening of institutional policies and some extension of curricular innovation activities could be observed.

Journal of Studies in International Education, Vol. 5, No. 3, 201-227 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/102831530153003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Studies in International EducationHome page
R. Stronkhorst
Learning Outcomes of International Mobility at Two Dutch Institutions of Higher Education
Journal of Studies in International Education, December 1, 2005; 9(4): 292 - 315.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Studies in International EducationHome page
U. Teichler
Mutual Recognition and Credit Transfer in Europe: Experiences and Problems
Journal of Studies in International Education, December 1, 2003; 7(4): 312 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Studies in International EducationHome page
B. Burn
The Curriculum as a Global Domain
Journal of Studies in International Education, September 1, 2002; 6(3): 253 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]